Tuesday, July 23, 2013

How Copyright Makes Books and Music Disappear

Worth a read:

A random sample of new books for sale on Amazon.com shows more books for sale from the 1880’s than the 1980’s. Why? This paper presents new data on how copyright seems to make works disappear. First, a random sample of 2300 new books for sale on Amazon.com is analyzed along with a random sample of 2000 songs available on new DVD’s. Copyright status correlates highly with absence from the Amazon shelf. Together with publishing business models, copyright law seems to stifle distribution and access. Second, the availability on YouTube of songs that reached number one on the U.S., French, and Brazilian pop charts from 1930-60 is analyzed in terms of the identity of the uploader, type of upload, number of views, date of upload, and monetization status. An analysis of the data demonstrates that the DMCA safe harbor system as applied to YouTube helps maintain some level of access to old songs by allowing those possessing copies (primarily infringers) to communicate relatively costlessly with copyright owners to satisfy the market of potential listeners.

Read the rest at:

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2290181

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

Android powered google glasses - Wow

Original article at: http://www.extremetech.com/computing/119375-android-powered-google-glasses-the-augmented-reality-hud-dream-is-coming Android-powered Google Glasses: The augmented reality HUD dream is coming It’s about time: By the end of 2012, Google will launch a pair of Android-powered, augmented reality, head-up display (HUD) glasses. Anonymous Google employees, speaking to The New York Times, say that the glasses will resemble a pair of Oakley Thumps (pictured above), will have 3G or 4G connectivity, a forward-facing camera, GPS, and a full array of movement sensors. They will cost “around the price of current smartphones.” Unlike Google’s upcoming home entertainment system, a pair of wearable Google Glasses makes an awful lot of sense. Google’s arsenal of real-time, mobile, location-aware services is second to none; Search, Latitude, Goggles(!), Maps, Places/Hotpot, Navigation, AdSense, Transit, Wallet, Offers, Product Search, Translate, Voice, Music — each and every one of them could be built into a pair of Android-based spectacles, and boy would the end result be awesome. Let’s take a look at what life with a pair of Googgles would be like. You wake up, shower, and put on your Google specs. Latitude records your movement and marks you as “awake.” Brushing your teeth in front of the mirror, Maps tells you that there’s traffic on the way to work. Hopping into the car, Navigation shows you a different route to work. As you pass Dunkin’ Donuts, Places warns you that the remains of a rat were recently found in a cup of coffee — but at the same time, Offers tells you that a cup of coffee and a donut is only $1. While stopped at some lights, you check out a hottie crossing the road, and Goggles pops up their Google+ profile. You could even snap a photo or quick video, with that front-facing camera. At the office, or perhaps back at home in front of the TV, Translate would mean that you can understand any written or spoken language. All the while, Music is piping favorite tunes through your earbuds — or perhaps via Bluetooth to your car stereo or your Google home entertainment system — and Wallet means you never have to reach for your credit card or train ticket. It goes without saying, of course, that you could also make phone calls — either with 3G/4G Voice VoIP, or plain old GSM. In short, Google could finally kick start the wearable computer dream. This has been a long time coming, and ultimately inevitable given the continued miniaturization and commoditization of computer chips. As utopian as this sounds, though, it’s important to ground Google’s AR glasses in reality. To begin with, the first Google Glasses will only have a subset of the features listed above. Battery power density remains an ever-present issue, too, both in terms of bulkiness and longevity — though with a much smaller display than a smartphone or tablet, it’s possible that the Googgles won’t be much heavier than a pair of active 3D glasses, and a few hours of active use should be possible. Then there are the privacy, security, and ethical repercussions to consider. The New York Times piece mentions that Google X labs, the team behind the glasses, wants to “ensure that people know if they are being recorded by someone wearing a pair of glasses with a built-in camera.” Obviously, though, the repercussions of a wearable computer that a) knows where you are, and b) what you’re looking at, will require a lot more than a blinking red “record” light on the front of the specs. The phrase “tracking cookie” takes on a whole new meaning when Google also correlates your real-world activities with your online presence. Remember, Google is ultimately an advertising company, where eyeballs directly translate into money — and it’s hard to get any closer to your eyes than a pair of augmented reality glasses. When you look at a car dealership, Google will be able to display ads from a competitor. When you sit in front of a computer, or TV, or stare through a shop window, the glasses will be able to track your head movements and report back on the efficacy of display ads. Perhaps most excitingly, when you read a newspaper or book or other static medium, Google could even overlay its own, interactive ads. If Google can allay our concerns — or make the experience awesome enough that our concerns melt away — then augmented reality really will be as powerful as I’ve described. It was only yesterday that David and I discussed whether tablets or smartphones would lead the future of mobile computing — and now it seems like we should’ve considered a third option as well: glasses. For Google, assuming it manufactures these glasses through its new Motorola subsidiary, this could finally be a way to generate revenue from something other than search, and without facing off against Apple and Samsung. Genius. Read more at The New York Times, or check out the Sony SmartAR demo and some in-car examples to see what augmented reality head-up displays are capable of.

Saturday, August 13, 2011

How Apple (unintentionally) revolutionized corporate IT



In 1997, Michael Dell famously declared that if he were CEO of Apple (AAPL), he would close shop and return the money to shareholders. Steve Jobs has had plenty of reasons to gloat since then, but even just a decade ago, Apple was a footnote in the story of modern computing. Despite the company's comeback success with the iMac, the vast majority of 'knowledge workers' still relied on their staid WinTel (Windows + Intel (INTC)) platform, with the occasional marketer, designer or developer opting for Apple's sleeker products. Naturally, Windows PCs were also the familiar, mainstream choice for our personal lives. And so it seemed that Apple would be relegated to devices for the hip digital consumer and creative elite. Read More....

Thursday, March 18, 2010

Gleebox

gleeBox is an experimental project that takes a keyboard-centric approach to navigating the web. It provides alternatives to actions that are traditionally performed via the mouse. Some of these are radically more efficient than using a mouse, some not so much. In all cases, they are mostly meant for keyboard and command line lovers.

Go see the rest at: http://thegleebox.com/

Friday, February 5, 2010

Google's Chrome OS tablet is coming soon

Did you know that Google's ChomeOS is taking the form of a Tablet? I covered a previous report on the matter, but now we are starting to get images of prototype OS shots. And they look very tablet- y.

Read the rest at:
http://blogs.computerworld.com/15513/watch_out_ipad_googles_chome_os_tablet_is_coming_soon?source=CTWNLE_nlt_os_2010-02-04